London’s skyline is about to get a major upgrade, and it’s not just about bricks and mortar—it’s about the soul of the city. But here’s where it gets controversial: Sadiq Khan has just appointed 25 new design advocates, joining 28 existing experts, to reshape the capital’s built environment. Is this the key to a more inclusive, sustainable, and beautiful London, or are we overlooking the voices that truly matter? Let’s dive in.
The latest cohort includes heavyweights like Satish Jassal, founder of Satish Jassal Architects, and Finn Williams, co-founder of Public Practice. These architects, urban designers, landscape architects, and sustainability experts are part of Khan’s Good Growth by Design programme, launched in 2017. Its mission? To ensure London’s buildings and public spaces are not just functional, but also inclusive and high-quality. And this is the part most people miss: almost half of the advocates are women or from Black, Asian, or other Minority Ethnic backgrounds, championing diversity in a field that’s often criticized for its homogeneity.
The programme isn’t just about aesthetics—it’s about impact. Since its inception, advocates have reviewed over 100 projects through the London Review Panel, directly influencing mayoral decisions and shaping policies. Deputy Mayor Jules Pipe hailed the new cohort, saying, ‘They bring exceptional talent and commitment… ensuring growth across the capital is inclusive, sustainable, and of the highest quality.’ But is this enough? Critics argue that true inclusivity requires more than just diverse representation—it demands community engagement at every level. What do you think?
The new advocates will focus on three key objectives: improving the quality, sustainability, and diversity of schemes under review, while setting standards for design and place-making. Notable names include Fiona Scott of Gort Scott Architects, Jo McCafferty of Levitt Bernstein, and Angeli Ganoo-Fletcher of PRP. They join existing advocates like Paul Monaghan of AHMM and Farshid Moussavi, founder of Farshid Moussavi Architecture.
Here’s the bold question: Can a group of experts, no matter how diverse, truly capture the needs of London’s millions? Or is this just another top-down approach in disguise? The programme’s emphasis on diversity is commendable, but it raises broader questions about power and decision-making in urban planning. Should communities have more direct say in how their spaces are designed?
As London continues to grow, the stakes are higher than ever. The built environment doesn’t just reflect our values—it shapes them. Khan’s advocates are tasked with a monumental challenge: balancing ambition with accessibility, innovation with tradition. Will they succeed? Only time will tell. But one thing’s for sure: this conversation is far from over. What’s your take? Do these appointments signal progress, or is there more work to be done? Let’s debate in the comments!
